https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395194 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the confiscation of goods and redemption fine. It found that the requirement to affix the BIS Mark was not applicable during the shipment in January 2017, as the Stainless Steel Products (Quality Control) Order, 2016 was not in force at that time. The Tribunal emphasized that the date of import should be based on the shipment date from the supplying country, not the arrival date at an Indian port. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:20:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395194 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the confiscation of goods and redemption fine. It found that the requirement to affix the BIS Mark was not applicable during the shipment in January 2017, as the Stainless Steel Products (Quality Control) Order, 2016 was not in force at that time. The Tribunal emphasized that the date of import should be based on the shipment date from the supplying country, not the arrival date at an Indian port. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395194