<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1355 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287928</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the appeal as the issue was previously addressed in a judgment. The Tribunal relied on CIT vs. ACE Builders Pvt. Ltd., approved by SC in CIT, Panji vs. V.S.Dempo Company Ltd. No substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 10:57:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1355 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287928</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the appeal as the issue was previously addressed in a judgment. The Tribunal relied on CIT vs. ACE Builders Pvt. Ltd., approved by SC in CIT, Panji vs. V.S.Dempo Company Ltd. No substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>