<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1559 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287920</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the disallowance of interest on advances for harvesting and transport of sugarcane, cane development expenses, general meeting expenses, telephone expenses, vehicle expenses, and advertisement expenses. However, the disallowance of expenses for inserting greetings to political functionaries was confirmed. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of interest on advances and allow the claims of the assessee for general meeting, telephone, vehicle, and advertisement expenses. The matter of cane development expenses was referred back for further examination in line with Supreme Court directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2020 13:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1559 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287920</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the disallowance of interest on advances for harvesting and transport of sugarcane, cane development expenses, general meeting expenses, telephone expenses, vehicle expenses, and advertisement expenses. However, the disallowance of expenses for inserting greetings to political functionaries was confirmed. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of interest on advances and allow the claims of the assessee for general meeting, telephone, vehicle, and advertisement expenses. The matter of cane development expenses was referred back for further examination in line with Supreme Court directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>