<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 199 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand on in-house generated carbon dioxide used for carbonation in beer manufacturing. The decision was based on the finding that the carbon dioxide, lacking purification facilities and differing from purchased gas, was not marketable and therefore not dutiable. The appellant received consequential benefits as the Tribunal relied on a precedent decision emphasizing the marketability requirement for dutiability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 199 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand on in-house generated carbon dioxide used for carbonation in beer manufacturing. The decision was based on the finding that the carbon dioxide, lacking purification facilities and differing from purchased gas, was not marketable and therefore not dutiable. The appellant received consequential benefits as the Tribunal relied on a precedent decision emphasizing the marketability requirement for dutiability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>