<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1348 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287919</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the concurrent findings of fact endorsing the addition under Section 153(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the lower appellate authorities&#039; decision was well-founded, considering the incriminating documents seized during the search and the assessee&#039;s admissions regarding investments. The appellant&#039;s argument that the ownership of the mines was different and the subsequent retraction were not sufficient to disprove the initial findings. The Court emphasized the importance of the burden of proof in challenging such findings and dismissed the appeal, stating no question of law arose from the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2020 00:07:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1348 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287919</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the concurrent findings of fact endorsing the addition under Section 153(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the lower appellate authorities&#039; decision was well-founded, considering the incriminating documents seized during the search and the assessee&#039;s admissions regarding investments. The appellant&#039;s argument that the ownership of the mines was different and the subsequent retraction were not sufficient to disprove the initial findings. The Court emphasized the importance of the burden of proof in challenging such findings and dismissed the appeal, stating no question of law arose from the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>