<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 883 - COMPANY LAW BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287911</link>
    <description>The court found the petition maintainable, allowing for an investigation under section 237(b) of the Companies Act, 1956. Respondents were directed to investigate the company&#039;s affairs due to fraudulent share transfers and non-compliance with statutory requirements. Respondent No. 9 was discharged, parties to bear their own costs, pending CAs disposed of, and interim orders vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 16:19:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 883 - COMPANY LAW BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287911</link>
      <description>The court found the petition maintainable, allowing for an investigation under section 237(b) of the Companies Act, 1956. Respondents were directed to investigate the company&#039;s affairs due to fraudulent share transfers and non-compliance with statutory requirements. Respondent No. 9 was discharged, parties to bear their own costs, pending CAs disposed of, and interim orders vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>