https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287909 Certiorari cannot be used to correct a competent tribunal's decision merely because it is thought to be wrong on the merits. Where the Labour Commissioner acted within the jurisdiction conferred by section 51, and the parties had invoked that jurisdiction, an erroneous conclusion alone did not justify supervisory interference. No jurisdictional failure, error apparent on the face of the record, procedural irregularity, or breach of natural justice was shown. The High Court, by reappraising the merits and quashing the Commissioner's decision, exceeded the proper scope of certiorari; the quashing order was therefore unsustainable. en-us Thu, 10 Apr 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 May 2020 16:01:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287909 Certiorari cannot be used to correct a competent tribunal's decision merely because it is thought to be wrong on the merits. Where the Labour Commissioner acted within the jurisdiction conferred by section 51, and the parties had invoked that jurisdiction, an erroneous conclusion alone did not justify supervisory interference. No jurisdictional failure, error apparent on the face of the record, procedural irregularity, or breach of natural justice was shown. The High Court, by reappraising the merits and quashing the Commissioner's decision, exceeded the proper scope of certiorari; the quashing order was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Apr 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287909