https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287908 The court held that the Legislative Assembly's privileges under Article 194(3) could override the petitioner's fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a). The majority judgment dismissed the petition, finding no procedural irregularities or evidence of mala fides in the Legislative Assembly's actions. However, a dissenting opinion argued that the fundamental right to freedom of speech should prevail over the claimed privileges of the Legislative Assembly. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 May 2020 15:33:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287908 The court held that the Legislative Assembly's privileges under Article 194(3) could override the petitioner's fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a). The majority judgment dismissed the petition, finding no procedural irregularities or evidence of mala fides in the Legislative Assembly's actions. However, a dissenting opinion argued that the fundamental right to freedom of speech should prevail over the claimed privileges of the Legislative Assembly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287908