<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (8) TMI 101 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287906</link>
    <description>The court upheld the legality of the water-tax imposed by the Saharanpur Municipal Board, dismissing the petitions challenging its imposition. The court found that the Board&#039;s actions were in compliance with the relevant legal provisions and that the petitioners lacked standing to challenge the tax on certain grounds. Additionally, the court determined that the legislative competence of the U.P. Legislature to impose the water-tax was valid and that the delegation of power to the executive regarding the radius for water-tax applicability was permissible. The petitioners were directed to pay costs to the Municipal Board.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 13:25:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (8) TMI 101 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287906</link>
      <description>The court upheld the legality of the water-tax imposed by the Saharanpur Municipal Board, dismissing the petitions challenging its imposition. The court found that the Board&#039;s actions were in compliance with the relevant legal provisions and that the petitioners lacked standing to challenge the tax on certain grounds. Additionally, the court determined that the legislative competence of the U.P. Legislature to impose the water-tax was valid and that the delegation of power to the executive regarding the radius for water-tax applicability was permissible. The petitioners were directed to pay costs to the Municipal Board.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>