<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 194 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395161</link>
    <description>The court set aside the refund rejection order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the respondent to issue a reasoned order within four weeks. The decision addressed deficiencies in the claim, lack of consideration of the petitioner&#039;s response, and the need for compliance with the law in reviewing the refund application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 11:43:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 194 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395161</link>
      <description>The court set aside the refund rejection order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the respondent to issue a reasoned order within four weeks. The decision addressed deficiencies in the claim, lack of consideration of the petitioner&#039;s response, and the need for compliance with the law in reviewing the refund application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>