<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 188 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395155</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of genuine explanations for capital contributions and the treatment of unexplained income in cases of non-business activity. The Tribunal held that unexplained income cannot be presumed in the absence of business activity and deleted the addition of &amp;amp;8377; 40 lakhs in the hands of the assessee firm. The decision was based on legal precedents and the dissolution deed of the assessee firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 11:33:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 188 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395155</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of genuine explanations for capital contributions and the treatment of unexplained income in cases of non-business activity. The Tribunal held that unexplained income cannot be presumed in the absence of business activity and deleted the addition of &amp;amp;8377; 40 lakhs in the hands of the assessee firm. The decision was based on legal precedents and the dissolution deed of the assessee firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>