<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (10) TMI 138 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287903</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision to set aside an order of acquittal in cases involving offenses under section 420 IPC and section 13 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act. The Court ruled that the acquittal based on invalid compounding of offenses was not in accordance with the law. It clarified the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction to interfere with such acquittals and emphasized that without valid permission for compounding the offense under section 13, the entire permission is considered invalid. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the setting aside of the acquittal in both cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 11:29:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (10) TMI 138 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287903</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision to set aside an order of acquittal in cases involving offenses under section 420 IPC and section 13 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act. The Court ruled that the acquittal based on invalid compounding of offenses was not in accordance with the law. It clarified the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction to interfere with such acquittals and emphasized that without valid permission for compounding the offense under section 13, the entire permission is considered invalid. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the setting aside of the acquittal in both cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>