https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287903 Compounding is permissible only where the offence is legally compoundable, and an acquittal based on compounding of a non-compoundable offence is not in accordance with law. The text states that an offence under section 13 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, founded on contravention of sections 3(2)(a) and 4, was not compoundable with or without permission. It also states that the revisional power could be exercised where acquittal rested on invalid compounding, and that permission to compound was indivisible and could not be sustained for one offence while rejected for another. The High Court's order setting aside the acquittal and directing the trial to proceed was therefore upheld. en-us Fri, 13 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 May 2020 11:29:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287903 Compounding is permissible only where the offence is legally compoundable, and an acquittal based on compounding of a non-compoundable offence is not in accordance with law. The text states that an offence under section 13 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, founded on contravention of sections 3(2)(a) and 4, was not compoundable with or without permission. It also states that the revisional power could be exercised where acquittal rested on invalid compounding, and that permission to compound was indivisible and could not be sustained for one offence while rejected for another. The High Court's order setting aside the acquittal and directing the trial to proceed was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287903