<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 94 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22241</link>
    <description>The court directed the Tribunal to re-examine the material on record and the assessee&#039;s explanations to determine if the initial burden of rebutting the presumption of concealment had been discharged. The Tribunal was instructed to reassess the applicability of the Explanation to Section 271(1)(c) and the main clause (c) of Section 271(1) based on a thorough evaluation of the evidence and explanations provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 94 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22241</link>
      <description>The court directed the Tribunal to re-examine the material on record and the assessee&#039;s explanations to determine if the initial burden of rebutting the presumption of concealment had been discharged. The Tribunal was instructed to reassess the applicability of the Explanation to Section 271(1)(c) and the main clause (c) of Section 271(1) based on a thorough evaluation of the evidence and explanations provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>