<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (12) TMI 114 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287884</link>
    <description>The Court declared the Bombay Land Tenure Abolition Laws (Amendment) Act, 1958, unconstitutional and void, specifically sections 3, 4, and 6. It found the Act violated fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, and 31 of the Constitution by altering the definition of permanent tenants and depriving petitioners of their rights without compensation. The legislation was deemed colorable, as it effectively confiscated property. The Act retroactively altered tenure-holders&#039; rights, reducing their entitlements. A separate judgment concurred, emphasizing the unconstitutional nature of redefining permanent tenants. The petitions were allowed, with the Act being declared void.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 10:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (12) TMI 114 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287884</link>
      <description>The Court declared the Bombay Land Tenure Abolition Laws (Amendment) Act, 1958, unconstitutional and void, specifically sections 3, 4, and 6. It found the Act violated fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, and 31 of the Constitution by altering the definition of permanent tenants and depriving petitioners of their rights without compensation. The legislation was deemed colorable, as it effectively confiscated property. The Act retroactively altered tenure-holders&#039; rights, reducing their entitlements. A separate judgment concurred, emphasizing the unconstitutional nature of redefining permanent tenants. The petitions were allowed, with the Act being declared void.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>