https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395122 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving the confiscation of imported goods for violating Import Trade Control restrictions. Despite the Revenue's appeal for a review of the reduced redemption fine and personal penalty, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere, citing a precedent suggesting specific percentages for fines and penalties. The impugned order was upheld, emphasizing the need for consistency and adherence to established precedents in determining penalties for Import Trade Control violations. en-us Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 May 2020 09:42:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395122 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving the confiscation of imported goods for violating Import Trade Control restrictions. Despite the Revenue's appeal for a review of the reduced redemption fine and personal penalty, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere, citing a precedent suggesting specific percentages for fines and penalties. The impugned order was upheld, emphasizing the need for consistency and adherence to established precedents in determining penalties for Import Trade Control violations. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395122