https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287878 The court refused the interim injunctions in cases involving the trademarks "LIPU" and "SUNSHINE," directing defendants to maintain and provide authenticated sales accounts. Plaintiffs failed to establish exclusive use of the marks, as both parties had utilized them without registration for a significant period. The court found a prima facie case of reverse passing off by the plaintiffs in the "LIPU" case, as both parties imported machines from the same manufacturers in China. The issue of proprietorship of the trademarks remains unsettled pending trial. en-us Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 May 2020 09:07:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287878 The court refused the interim injunctions in cases involving the trademarks "LIPU" and "SUNSHINE," directing defendants to maintain and provide authenticated sales accounts. Plaintiffs failed to establish exclusive use of the marks, as both parties had utilized them without registration for a significant period. The court found a prima facie case of reverse passing off by the plaintiffs in the "LIPU" case, as both parties imported machines from the same manufacturers in China. The issue of proprietorship of the trademarks remains unsettled pending trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287878