https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287875 A claim for unpaid electric energy was treated as a price claim rather than a claim for relief on the ground of mistake. Article 96 of the Limitation Act applies only where the cause of action is founded on mistake itself; a delayed bill or demand does not change the ordinary limitation applicable to the debt. Electric energy was also treated as "goods" because it is movable property bought and sold as a commodity. As a result, the claim fell under the limitation period for goods sold and delivered, and recovery was confined to the period not barred by limitation. en-us Fri, 23 Nov 1945 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 May 2020 17:11:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287875 A claim for unpaid electric energy was treated as a price claim rather than a claim for relief on the ground of mistake. Article 96 of the Limitation Act applies only where the cause of action is founded on mistake itself; a delayed bill or demand does not change the ordinary limitation applicable to the debt. Electric energy was also treated as "goods" because it is movable property bought and sold as a commodity. As a result, the claim fell under the limitation period for goods sold and delivered, and recovery was confined to the period not barred by limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Nov 1945 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287875