https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287872 The court upheld the validity of the ex parte injunction order, emphasizing that the absence of reasons does not invalidate the order if supported by evidence. It stressed the necessity of injunctions to protect the plaintiff's interests during litigation, despite the doctrine of lis pendens. The court affirmed the trial judge's decision to issue the injunction, noting that interim findings do not replace final decisions. The appeal was dismissed, with the trial judge instructed to expedite the hearing on the temporary injunction application. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 May 2020 20:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287872 The court upheld the validity of the ex parte injunction order, emphasizing that the absence of reasons does not invalidate the order if supported by evidence. It stressed the necessity of injunctions to protect the plaintiff's interests during litigation, despite the doctrine of lis pendens. The court affirmed the trial judge's decision to issue the injunction, noting that interim findings do not replace final decisions. The appeal was dismissed, with the trial judge instructed to expedite the hearing on the temporary injunction application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287872