https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287871 Calcutta HC stayed an ex parte ad interim injunction order restraining a club's AGM due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, as the club's registered office was outside the trial court's jurisdiction. The court found suppression of material facts by the plaintiff, who failed to disclose knowledge of the AGM from June 5, 2002, despite seeking injunction on June 20, 2002 for AGM scheduled June 21, 2002. The trial court improperly exercised discretion without considering balance of convenience and made assumptions about protecting majority members' interests without their representation. The HC disposed of both the appeal and stay application with directions for proper hearing. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287871 Calcutta HC stayed an ex parte ad interim injunction order restraining a club's AGM due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, as the club's registered office was outside the trial court's jurisdiction. The court found suppression of material facts by the plaintiff, who failed to disclose knowledge of the AGM from June 5, 2002, despite seeking injunction on June 20, 2002 for AGM scheduled June 21, 2002. The trial court improperly exercised discretion without considering balance of convenience and made assumptions about protecting majority members' interests without their representation. The HC disposed of both the appeal and stay application with directions for proper hearing. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 04 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287871