https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287870 The court found three books to be obscene under Section 292 IPC due to their explicit content. The appellants were held to have the guilty mind required for the offense, as they should have been aware of the nature of the books they possessed. The initial rigorous imprisonment sentence was reduced to fines for the appellants, with modified default imprisonment terms. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the convictions under Section 292 IPC but without imposing a separate sentence under Section 292/109 IPC. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 May 2020 15:15:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287870 The court found three books to be obscene under Section 292 IPC due to their explicit content. The appellants were held to have the guilty mind required for the offense, as they should have been aware of the nature of the books they possessed. The initial rigorous imprisonment sentence was reduced to fines for the appellants, with modified default imprisonment terms. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the convictions under Section 292 IPC but without imposing a separate sentence under Section 292/109 IPC. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Apr 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287870