<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1944 (8) TMI 14 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287868</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and the sentence, and acquitted the applicant due to the lack of evidence regarding proper notification publication and the accused&#039;s knowledge, leading to insufficiency of grounds for the conviction. The fine, if paid, was ordered to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 15:05:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1944 (8) TMI 14 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287868</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and the sentence, and acquitted the applicant due to the lack of evidence regarding proper notification publication and the accused&#039;s knowledge, leading to insufficiency of grounds for the conviction. The fine, if paid, was ordered to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>