<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 706 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287866</link>
    <description>The court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the petitioner&#039;s actions were aimed at prolonging the legal process. The court clarified that the insolvency proceedings did not absolve the accused from criminal liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The revision was dismissed, and the trial court was instructed to proceed with the trial and reach a final decision based on the observations made in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 14:25:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 706 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287866</link>
      <description>The court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the petitioner&#039;s actions were aimed at prolonging the legal process. The court clarified that the insolvency proceedings did not absolve the accused from criminal liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The revision was dismissed, and the trial court was instructed to proceed with the trial and reach a final decision based on the observations made in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>