<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (1) TMI 89 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287862</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity and enforceability of the restrictive covenants in the employment agreement, dismissing the appeal. It found that the agreement did not unreasonably restrain trade and that the injunction granted by the lower courts was justified to protect the respondent company&#039;s proprietary information and interests. The Court emphasized the importance of safeguarding employer interests and upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 10:19:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (1) TMI 89 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287862</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity and enforceability of the restrictive covenants in the employment agreement, dismissing the appeal. It found that the agreement did not unreasonably restrain trade and that the injunction granted by the lower courts was justified to protect the respondent company&#039;s proprietary information and interests. The Court emphasized the importance of safeguarding employer interests and upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>