<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 144 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395111</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act but found the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s directive for the assessee to stay until permission was granted to be highly unreasonable and a violation of Fundamental Rights. The Court directed the petitioner to cooperate with the inquiry but limited the duration of the assessee&#039;s presence until 7.00 p.m. or any earlier specified time, emphasizing the balance between taxpayer rights and tax officer authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 06:49:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 144 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395111</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act but found the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s directive for the assessee to stay until permission was granted to be highly unreasonable and a violation of Fundamental Rights. The Court directed the petitioner to cooperate with the inquiry but limited the duration of the assessee&#039;s presence until 7.00 p.m. or any earlier specified time, emphasizing the balance between taxpayer rights and tax officer authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>