<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 140 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395107</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of advances written off by the assessee, stating that the parent company&#039;s decision not to reimburse did not justify the write-off as a business expense. Regarding the addition based on the AIR, the Tribunal directed the AO to verify the credit card payment details provided by the assessee before making a final determination, partially allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 06:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 140 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395107</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of advances written off by the assessee, stating that the parent company&#039;s decision not to reimburse did not justify the write-off as a business expense. Regarding the addition based on the AIR, the Tribunal directed the AO to verify the credit card payment details provided by the assessee before making a final determination, partially allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>