https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395098 The Tribunal held that the petitioners lacked standing as they were not members of the company, leading to the rejection of the company petition alleging oppression and mismanagement. The Tribunal found that the petition failed to rectify defects from a prior rejected petition and emphasized the jurisdiction of the Tribunal over a civil court due to the Companies Act. The petition was dismissed, highlighting the questionable conduct of the petitioners and their attempt to disrupt the affairs of the institution. en-us Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 May 2020 06:29:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395098 The Tribunal held that the petitioners lacked standing as they were not members of the company, leading to the rejection of the company petition alleging oppression and mismanagement. The Tribunal found that the petition failed to rectify defects from a prior rejected petition and emphasized the jurisdiction of the Tribunal over a civil court due to the Companies Act. The petition was dismissed, highlighting the questionable conduct of the petitioners and their attempt to disrupt the affairs of the institution. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395098