<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 129 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — ALLAHABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395096</link>
    <description>For admission under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the applicant must prove a financial debt, default, and a claim within limitation. Deposits into the corporate debtor&#039;s account were not enough because no agreement, repayment term, or interest arrangement showed disbursement against the time value of money, so the amounts did not qualify as financial debt and the applicants were not financial creditors. The record also did not establish a distinct default date, and the 2019 filing was beyond three years from the last deposits. In the absence of adequate proof of default, the application was held not maintainable and the insolvency petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 06:25:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 129 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — ALLAHABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395096</link>
      <description>For admission under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the applicant must prove a financial debt, default, and a claim within limitation. Deposits into the corporate debtor&#039;s account were not enough because no agreement, repayment term, or interest arrangement showed disbursement against the time value of money, so the amounts did not qualify as financial debt and the applicants were not financial creditors. The record also did not establish a distinct default date, and the 2019 filing was beyond three years from the last deposits. In the absence of adequate proof of default, the application was held not maintainable and the insolvency petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>