<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1779 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — NEW DELHI—II BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287845</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition, finding no grounds for oppression or mismanagement. The reliance on Article 7 was deemed misplaced, and the transactions and decisions questioned by the petitioners were found to be within the Board&#039;s authority. The petitioners&#039; claims were considered untenable, and the petition was dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 06:01:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1779 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — NEW DELHI—II BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287845</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition, finding no grounds for oppression or mismanagement. The reliance on Article 7 was deemed misplaced, and the transactions and decisions questioned by the petitioners were found to be within the Board&#039;s authority. The petitioners&#039; claims were considered untenable, and the petition was dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>