<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1862 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287854</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition, ruling that criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act could be maintained against the petitioner despite being declared insolvent. The judgment clarified that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code&#039;s Section 14 does not bar criminal actions, distinguishing them from civil proceedings. Therefore, the respondent could proceed with legal action for the dishonored cheque, as the nature of penal actions is distinct from civil claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 06:01:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1862 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287854</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition, ruling that criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act could be maintained against the petitioner despite being declared insolvent. The judgment clarified that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code&#039;s Section 14 does not bar criminal actions, distinguishing them from civil proceedings. Therefore, the respondent could proceed with legal action for the dishonored cheque, as the nature of penal actions is distinct from civil claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>