https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287830 Sections 8 and 38 of the Ajmer Abolition of Intermediaries and Land Reforms Act, 1955 were treated as ancillary to the main abolition scheme and therefore protected under Article 31-A(1)(a); retrospective operation and rent regulation were upheld as measures to prevent defeat of the reform law. Legislative competence was found under the relevant acquisition entry and the Government of Part C States Act, 1951 because the controlling factor was the purpose of acquisition, not the post-acquisition vesting of title. A jagirdar was held to be an intermediary as the holder of an estate, so jagir estates were liable to vest under the Act. en-us Fri, 14 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 May 2020 12:05:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287830 Sections 8 and 38 of the Ajmer Abolition of Intermediaries and Land Reforms Act, 1955 were treated as ancillary to the main abolition scheme and therefore protected under Article 31-A(1)(a); retrospective operation and rent regulation were upheld as measures to prevent defeat of the reform law. Legislative competence was found under the relevant acquisition entry and the Government of Part C States Act, 1951 because the controlling factor was the purpose of acquisition, not the post-acquisition vesting of title. A jagirdar was held to be an intermediary as the holder of an estate, so jagir estates were liable to vest under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287830