<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 121 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for both the unpaid amounts to M/s Sky Gems and M/s AR Gems and the amount of Rs. 1,20,54,761/- written off in a subsequent year. The Tribunal emphasized the need for positive evidence of cessation of liability and found no basis for the additions in the current year. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 08:21:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 121 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for both the unpaid amounts to M/s Sky Gems and M/s AR Gems and the amount of Rs. 1,20,54,761/- written off in a subsequent year. The Tribunal emphasized the need for positive evidence of cessation of liability and found no basis for the additions in the current year. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>