<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 62 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22218</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the individual assessee and his wife, partners in a firm, in a case concerning the reopening of income-tax assessments for the years 1968-69 to 1970-71. The court found that all necessary facts were disclosed during the original assessments, and there was no new information to justify reopening under sections 147(a) or 147(b) of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the reassessments made by the Income-tax Officer were canceled, and the court ruled against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:41:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 62 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22218</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the individual assessee and his wife, partners in a firm, in a case concerning the reopening of income-tax assessments for the years 1968-69 to 1970-71. The court found that all necessary facts were disclosed during the original assessments, and there was no new information to justify reopening under sections 147(a) or 147(b) of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the reassessments made by the Income-tax Officer were canceled, and the court ruled against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>