<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 101 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition and related applications as misconceived, finding them not maintainable due to the petitioner&#039;s lack of membership in CSITA and failure to establish specific acts of mismanagement or oppression. The petitioner&#039;s claims were undermined by documents filed by the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 101 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition and related applications as misconceived, finding them not maintainable due to the petitioner&#039;s lack of membership in CSITA and failure to establish specific acts of mismanagement or oppression. The petitioner&#039;s claims were undermined by documents filed by the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>