<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1454 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287826</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan High Court admitted the appeal on two substantial questions of law: whether the reassessment proceedings and the consequential assessment order were nullities, and whether the Tribunal erred in setting aside the entire quantum proceedings. Notice was issued to the respondent, leaving these legal issues for determination in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 08:19:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1454 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287826</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan High Court admitted the appeal on two substantial questions of law: whether the reassessment proceedings and the consequential assessment order were nullities, and whether the Tribunal erred in setting aside the entire quantum proceedings. Notice was issued to the respondent, leaving these legal issues for determination in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>