<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 89 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22215</link>
    <description>The court ruled that for the assessment years 1964-65 and 1965-66, royalty deduction should be based on the government-sanctioned rate of 1 1/2 pence per pound. However, for the assessment year 1966-67, the deduction should be per the agreed rate of 4 1/2 pence per pound. Regarding the treatment of the difference in royalty liability for the assessment year 1967-68, the liability written off with the foreign company&#039;s consent should be treated as income under section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act for years other than 1966-67.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:34:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 89 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22215</link>
      <description>The court ruled that for the assessment years 1964-65 and 1965-66, royalty deduction should be based on the government-sanctioned rate of 1 1/2 pence per pound. However, for the assessment year 1966-67, the deduction should be per the agreed rate of 4 1/2 pence per pound. Regarding the treatment of the difference in royalty liability for the assessment year 1967-68, the liability written off with the foreign company&#039;s consent should be treated as income under section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act for years other than 1966-67.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>