<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 92 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395059</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ application, allowing the petitioner to argue the show cause notice deserved discharge. The court directed the continuation of proceedings under Section 130 of the GST Act, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements and the need for authorities to establish a strong case before invoking Section 130. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to rely on observations from a previous case regarding contravention and intent to evade tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 92 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395059</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ application, allowing the petitioner to argue the show cause notice deserved discharge. The court directed the continuation of proceedings under Section 130 of the GST Act, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements and the need for authorities to establish a strong case before invoking Section 130. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to rely on observations from a previous case regarding contravention and intent to evade tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>