<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 80 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395047</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to consider interest paid to the bank for acquiring the capital asset as eligible part of the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains under Section 48 of the IT Act. The decision was based on precedents establishing that interest can form part of the cost of assets for capital gains calculations when purchased using borrowed funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 80 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395047</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to consider interest paid to the bank for acquiring the capital asset as eligible part of the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains under Section 48 of the IT Act. The decision was based on precedents establishing that interest can form part of the cost of assets for capital gains calculations when purchased using borrowed funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>