<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 66 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395033</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Authority directed the Committee of Creditors to consider the Resolution Plan submitted by Sify Technologies Limited along with objections. Another Resolution Applicant, Honest Orbit Ventures, was allowed to have their Resolution Plan considered. The claim of the Government Department was admitted, and the impugned order was challenged in appeal. Objections to Sify Technologies Limited&#039;s Resolution Plan were raised, arguing unrealistic aspects. The Tribunal declined to interfere, emphasizing asset maximization for stakeholders. The appeal was dismissed without costs due to lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 12:42:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 66 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395033</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Authority directed the Committee of Creditors to consider the Resolution Plan submitted by Sify Technologies Limited along with objections. Another Resolution Applicant, Honest Orbit Ventures, was allowed to have their Resolution Plan considered. The claim of the Government Department was admitted, and the impugned order was challenged in appeal. Objections to Sify Technologies Limited&#039;s Resolution Plan were raised, arguing unrealistic aspects. The Tribunal declined to interfere, emphasizing asset maximization for stakeholders. The appeal was dismissed without costs due to lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>