<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1498 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287799</link>
    <description>Treaty relief under the India-China DTAA was tested against Article 23 and section 5(2), and the claimed exemption for salary income failed because the treaty conditions for eliminating double taxation were not satisfied on the assessee&#039;s non-resident status; the salary was therefore taxable in India. The estimated house-property rental income lacked adequate supporting verification, so the matter was sent back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination after giving an opportunity of hearing. The appeal thus succeeded only to the limited extent of remand on the rental-income issue, while the salary exemption claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 12:41:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1498 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287799</link>
      <description>Treaty relief under the India-China DTAA was tested against Article 23 and section 5(2), and the claimed exemption for salary income failed because the treaty conditions for eliminating double taxation were not satisfied on the assessee&#039;s non-resident status; the salary was therefore taxable in India. The estimated house-property rental income lacked adequate supporting verification, so the matter was sent back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination after giving an opportunity of hearing. The appeal thus succeeded only to the limited extent of remand on the rental-income issue, while the salary exemption claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>