https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287807 The appellate court dismissed the appellant's claim for a 1/3rd share in the properties and firm income, citing insufficient pleadings regarding the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) status and ancestral nature of the properties. The court found that the proposed amendment did not address these deficiencies. The appellant's challenge to a will was deemed a separate cause of action, necessitating a distinct suit. The appeal was dismissed without costs, permitting the appellant to pursue a separate suit to contest the will and seek partition through intestacy. en-us Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287807 The appellate court dismissed the appellant's claim for a 1/3rd share in the properties and firm income, citing insufficient pleadings regarding the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) status and ancestral nature of the properties. The court found that the proposed amendment did not address these deficiencies. The appellant's challenge to a will was deemed a separate cause of action, necessitating a distinct suit. The appeal was dismissed without costs, permitting the appellant to pursue a separate suit to contest the will and seek partition through intestacy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287807