<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 10 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22208</link>
    <description>Rule 4 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 was held to cover income of a non-resident company accruing or arising outside India, because such income is outside &quot;total income&quot; under section 2(45) read with section 5(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The expression &quot;income, profits and gains ... not includible in its total income&quot; is therefore not confined to amounts expressly excluded by section 10. The prescribed surtax return form and notes also treated foreign income of a non-resident as income not includible in total income. The Tribunal&#039;s approach in computing capital was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:01:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 10 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22208</link>
      <description>Rule 4 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 was held to cover income of a non-resident company accruing or arising outside India, because such income is outside &quot;total income&quot; under section 2(45) read with section 5(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The expression &quot;income, profits and gains ... not includible in its total income&quot; is therefore not confined to amounts expressly excluded by section 10. The prescribed surtax return form and notes also treated foreign income of a non-resident as income not includible in total income. The Tribunal&#039;s approach in computing capital was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>