https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287810 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, directing the defendants to refund the earnest money with interest to the plaintiff within a specified timeframe instead of granting specific performance of the land sale agreement. The court considered the provisions of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and factors such as unfair advantage to the plaintiff and hardship on the defendant in reaching this decision. The judgment focused on achieving an equitable resolution based on the circumstances of the case, ultimately ruling in favor of the plaintiff. en-us Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2020 12:41:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287810 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, directing the defendants to refund the earnest money with interest to the plaintiff within a specified timeframe instead of granting specific performance of the land sale agreement. The court considered the provisions of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and factors such as unfair advantage to the plaintiff and hardship on the defendant in reaching this decision. The judgment focused on achieving an equitable resolution based on the circumstances of the case, ultimately ruling in favor of the plaintiff. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287810