https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287813 The court quashed the judgment dismissing the suit for lack of cause of action, which was based on the conversion of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC into one under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. The court allowed the amendment of the plaint to challenge a prior consent decree, emphasizing that the appellant was not a party to the compromise. The rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was found premature as the court should have assumed the averments in the plaint as correct. The suit was restored for further proceedings, highlighting the need for a trial to determine the merits of the appellant's claims. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2020 12:41:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287813 The court quashed the judgment dismissing the suit for lack of cause of action, which was based on the conversion of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC into one under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. The court allowed the amendment of the plaint to challenge a prior consent decree, emphasizing that the appellant was not a party to the compromise. The rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was found premature as the court should have assumed the averments in the plaint as correct. The suit was restored for further proceedings, highlighting the need for a trial to determine the merits of the appellant's claims. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287813