https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287813 At the stage of Order VII Rule 11 CPC, the court must confine itself to the plaint averments and the plaintiff's supporting documents, read as a whole on the assumption that they are correct. Defences in the written statement, or disputed questions about the authenticity, correctness, or proof of the pleaded facts, cannot be used to reject the plaint at threshold. On the pleadings and documents here, the amended plaint disclosed assertions regarding an HUF, HUF properties, and the plaintiff's share, which were sufficient to require trial. The application could not be converted into one under Order XII Rule 6, and the impugned order was set aside with restoration of the suit. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2020 12:41:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287813 At the stage of Order VII Rule 11 CPC, the court must confine itself to the plaint averments and the plaintiff's supporting documents, read as a whole on the assumption that they are correct. Defences in the written statement, or disputed questions about the authenticity, correctness, or proof of the pleaded facts, cannot be used to reject the plaint at threshold. On the pleadings and documents here, the amended plaint disclosed assertions regarding an HUF, HUF properties, and the plaintiff's share, which were sufficient to require trial. The application could not be converted into one under Order XII Rule 6, and the impugned order was set aside with restoration of the suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287813