https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287794 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete the additions for unexplained investment in land purchase and undisclosed profit from land transactions. The Tribunal also confirmed that the additional evidence admitted by the CIT(A) was not in violation of Rule 46A(3) as it was already part of the Revenue record. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed. en-us Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2020 08:39:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287794 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete the additions for unexplained investment in land purchase and undisclosed profit from land transactions. The Tribunal also confirmed that the additional evidence admitted by the CIT(A) was not in violation of Rule 46A(3) as it was already part of the Revenue record. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287794