https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287791 A suit for encroachment over immovable property must describe the disputed land with sufficient precision under Order VII Rule 3 CPC, so the property can be identified by boundaries, survey numbers or other clear particulars; where the encroached portion is not specifically pleaded and no map is filed, the plaint is liable to rejection and any decree becomes unworkable. The document also notes that, without properly proved demarcation and supporting evidence, reliance on a panchanama cannot sustain a finding of encroachment. Non-impleadment of the State under Order I Rule 3-B CPC was treated as a curable irregularity and not, by itself, fatal to maintainability. en-us Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 May 2020 16:40:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287791 A suit for encroachment over immovable property must describe the disputed land with sufficient precision under Order VII Rule 3 CPC, so the property can be identified by boundaries, survey numbers or other clear particulars; where the encroached portion is not specifically pleaded and no map is filed, the plaint is liable to rejection and any decree becomes unworkable. The document also notes that, without properly proved demarcation and supporting evidence, reliance on a panchanama cannot sustain a finding of encroachment. Non-impleadment of the State under Order I Rule 3-B CPC was treated as a curable irregularity and not, by itself, fatal to maintainability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287791