https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287790 An agreement to sell immovable property was held incapable of specific performance because the subject matter was described with such uncertainty that the property could not be identified with reasonable certainty, and no plan cured the ambiguity; the decree for specific performance was therefore set aside under Section 29 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Since execution of the agreement and receipt of the advance were admitted, restitution of the earnest money was maintained, but interest was refused because the record showed repeated requests to correct the property description before completion and the plaintiffs did not do so. The advance was refundable without interest. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 May 2020 16:33:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287790 An agreement to sell immovable property was held incapable of specific performance because the subject matter was described with such uncertainty that the property could not be identified with reasonable certainty, and no plan cured the ambiguity; the decree for specific performance was therefore set aside under Section 29 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Since execution of the agreement and receipt of the advance were admitted, restitution of the earnest money was maintained, but interest was refused because the record showed repeated requests to correct the property description before completion and the plaintiffs did not do so. The advance was refundable without interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287790