<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 51 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395018</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, granting deductions under Section 80IC for both the non-filing of Form No. 10CCB and the substantial expansion of the unit. The ITAT held that the audit report submission with the return is not mandatory and can be submitted during assessment proceedings. Additionally, the ITAT ruled that the assessee was entitled to claim 100% deduction for substantial expansion for five years within the 10-year period, based on legal precedents and provisions cited during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2020 11:01:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 51 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395018</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, granting deductions under Section 80IC for both the non-filing of Form No. 10CCB and the substantial expansion of the unit. The ITAT held that the audit report submission with the return is not mandatory and can be submitted during assessment proceedings. Additionally, the ITAT ruled that the assessee was entitled to claim 100% deduction for substantial expansion for five years within the 10-year period, based on legal precedents and provisions cited during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>