<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 587 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287781</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal, affirming the arbitrators&#039; award of Rs. 3,70,221.50 for the shortage of cement in bags supplied by the respondent. However, the appeal was dismissed for the claims regarding the method of measuring the constructed area and escalation in the cost of construction after the original contract period, upholding the Division Bench&#039;s decisions on these matters. No costs were ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2020 10:27:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 587 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287781</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal, affirming the arbitrators&#039; award of Rs. 3,70,221.50 for the shortage of cement in bags supplied by the respondent. However, the appeal was dismissed for the claims regarding the method of measuring the constructed area and escalation in the cost of construction after the original contract period, upholding the Division Bench&#039;s decisions on these matters. No costs were ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>