<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 47 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals related to the addition of bogus liabilities and penalties levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The assessing officer incorrectly applied section 68 to outstanding balances of sundry creditors, which were later paid off through legitimate means. The penalties were deleted due to the incorrect application of provisions and lack of evidence supporting the additions, ultimately resulting in the appeals being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2020 08:51:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 47 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals related to the addition of bogus liabilities and penalties levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The assessing officer incorrectly applied section 68 to outstanding balances of sundry creditors, which were later paid off through legitimate means. The penalties were deleted due to the incorrect application of provisions and lack of evidence supporting the additions, ultimately resulting in the appeals being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>