<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 36 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395003</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for FY 2013-2014 and FY 2014-2015, directing the deletion of late filing fees under Section 234E as the AO lacked authority before 01.06.2015. However, for FY 2015-2016 (3rd and 4th quarters), late fees were upheld post-amendment. The final order allowed appeals in ITA Nos. 440 to 447/CTK/2019 and dismissed appeals in ITA Nos. 448 &amp;amp; 449/CTK/2019, pronounced on 25/02/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 36 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395003</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for FY 2013-2014 and FY 2014-2015, directing the deletion of late filing fees under Section 234E as the AO lacked authority before 01.06.2015. However, for FY 2015-2016 (3rd and 4th quarters), late fees were upheld post-amendment. The final order allowed appeals in ITA Nos. 440 to 447/CTK/2019 and dismissed appeals in ITA Nos. 448 &amp;amp; 449/CTK/2019, pronounced on 25/02/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>